The Sustainable Minimalists Podcast is live: Listen here.
Is Sustainability Unmanly?

Is Sustainability Unmanly?

On this episode of The Sustainable Minimalists podcast we examine the relationship between eco-friendliness and femininity. We offer strategies for engaging men in the sustainability movement, too.

Is Sustainability Unmanly? An interview with Dr. James Wilkie.

Interviews are always best in audio. Listen here!


_____

Professor James Wilkie is a consumer psychologist + professor whose research examines how environmental cues and social norms can (automatically) influence consumers. His work has been published in some of marketing’s and psychology’s lead journals.

Is Eco-Friendly Unmanly? The Green-Feminine Stereotype and Its Effect on Sustainable Consumption” was highlighted as a 2016 “must-read” article for marketers by Marketing Science Institute’s (MSI) Academic Trustees.

His projects have been featured in outlets such as The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Scientific American, Time, NPR, CBSNews, The Guardian, Psychology Today, Boston Globe + the Toronto Star.

_____

The episode in a nutshell:

_____

Across cultures + ages, eco-friendly behavior is perceived as feminine.

Men are more uncomfortable crossing gender boundaries than women; as such, practicing eco-friendliness threatens masculinity.

Males must be made secure in their masculinity so they feel comfortable choosing sustainability more often.


“If a female wants to act in a masculine way, it’s not as threatening to others as if a male acts in a feminine way.”


Strategies Dr. Wilkie offers to engage men in sustainability: 

_____

– Practice gender identity maintenance by validating + affirming men’s masculinity.

– Discuss potential eco-friendly purchases in financial terms. 

– Talk about decisions in the near future (i.e. “We should really get this product because the other option could really harm our kids”).

– Reaffirm husband’s role as the family’s protector.

– Frame eco-friendly items using masculine words + darker colors ( i.e. describe a hybrid vehicle as eco-protective as opposed to eco-friendly).

– Don’t explicitly tell men what to do. Take a subtle approach, instead.


Notable quotes from the episode:

_____

“Our research was based on the long-standing understanding that women tend to be more eco-friendly than men. This is across ages and cultures.”

“We looked at the differences in how men and women are choices when choosing products that have a gender attached to it.”

“Men feel a pressure to behave in a masculine fashion because if we don’t we tend to be scrutinized more. Women face a similar pressure to act feminine, but the consequences … are smaller.”

“Nowadays, because women have really fought to take on more masculine roles, there’s less of a social argument against them choosing (masculine) things. Whereas with men we haven’t fought as much to take on more feminine roles + we therefore tend to be penalized more if we take on those products and purchase (feminine) things. It’s threatening to who we are as people.”

“There are men who want to be more environmentally friendly, but they feel a pressure NOT to be. That’s because environmentally friendly products are perceived to be feminine.”

“We found over and over again that eco-friendly products and actions are associated with the idea of femininity. The interesting things is, though, that behaviors harmful to the environment aren’t necessarily associated with masculinity.”

“It’s ironic in a sense that you typically think of women from a stereotypical standpoint of being the sensitive type. Yet when it comes to this gender argument, females when compared to men seem to be quite sensitive (to gender roles).”


Want the Show Notes sent directly to your inbox every week? Sign up here. 

Comments are closed.

Listen to the Podcast

The Sustainable Minimalists Podcast
Latest podcast:

The Unfollow Effect

We've come a long way. But not necessarily in the right direction.

From the the nostalgic days of AOL Instant Messenger to 2026's high-stakes, algorithmic landscape, constant connectivity has fundamentally shifted our attention spans, our peace of mind, and the way we show up for our families.

Worse, the desire to show up online often takes us directly out of real life. It's no surprise, then, that we're feeling the mental and emotional weight of the "scroll".

We don't have to throw our phones in a lake to find the reprieve we desperately need. On today's show author Emily Feldpausch argues that it isn’t about rejecting technology. It’s about reclaiming the intentionality that the algorithms try to take away.

Here's a preview:

[5:00] Reflections on the shift from the early days of AIM and MySpace to the current user experience that often feels designed against us

[8:45] How being always on has eroded our collective sense of peace and altered the dynamics of modern family life

[18:00] How to stop checking in and start being present

[23:00] A candid look at 2026 internet culture, from shopping hauls to harmful beauty standards. Can we still find corners of the web that align with our true values?

[27:00] Emily's personal strategies for maintaining phone boundaries to protect her mental space

 

Resources mentioned:


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Subscribe

My Story

Hello there, I’m Stephanie. I live a crazy, beautiful life as a full-time wife, blogger + mother to two spirited daughters. I’m on a mission to simplify eco-friendly living so as to greater enjoy life’s sweeter moments.

Want to know more? Read my story.

Sustainable minimalism for home, head + heart.

Join our community of eco-conscious women on a collective journey towards sustainable simplicity.

Join us!